You've really stepped into the "thick of it" with the art plagiarism issue and it looks like you have a few artists ready to grab pitchforks and torches. It is indeed a sensitive issue and glad you are prompting meaningful discussion.

Is it problematic for artists to intentional deceive users to give a more favorable impression of their work?

Yes, 100% agree that this action should be frowned upon from the community especially from honest artists as they would be the most affected.

Do I believe your response may be somewhat disproportional?

Maybe so. I think the act of deception should be attacked but personally I am more inclined to desire to forgive and reconcile the community with the person. What I try to see is the potential value the user may bring to the network if they are shown grace. I would try not to attack the character but behavior.

There are some users that will mistake an abuse fighters' kindness for weakness and that is why follow up is all the more critical to make sure they have not reverted to their old ways.

I also think it is perfectly reasonable for artists to include sources of inspiration when appropriate. In the cases we have discussed, think it is perfectly reasonable to have that requirement.

Maybe fan art would be an exception and other cases where the inspiration for the work exceeds 10 or more sources such as sort sort of inspired compilation. I think giving a pass on those would be fine.

We don't want to put up a barrier that is too stringent so artists would be afraid to contribute but at the same time there needs to be some standard for inspired works.

I hope you and the parties striving against you come to some sort of resolution. I think there is validity on both sides and seems to be just a matter of finding the middle ground.

Have a good one!

Posted using Partiko Android