Sort:  

Do you mean the comment I wrote to anarchyhasnogods or my comment to you?
Cause in the comment to anarchyhasnogods
It didn't started out that way I was the 4th sentence or so. It was about how things are named that and that the opposite is often the case.
Orwellian stuff. Or would you say that socialism in it current form is social?

I would say for socialism to be social I would need a choice to participate or at least have a choice between more communities, and the choice not to participate and live in a cave.

I suspect that your only willing to have a conversation if I'm agreeing with everything 100%. You and you're friends come across as dictators with whom one can not disagree or bad things will happen. This is not to put you down, but to show you that the "attitude" you show, makes it very clearly that the world is not gonna be a free place, if your group would come to power, free born people like me would not survive very long.

Hold up, you got me all wrong, I didn't read the comment that came to me because you started off on the wrong foot.
Then you accuse me of being a thug and wanting to rule you by force.
These have both been refuted in the post.
Either my proposal is adopted on it's merits or it doesn't fly.
If you want to do what you do, that is fine, but you will still be able to order what you need from the store and it will be delivered to you free.
If you want to persist in your crapitalust ways, I'm sure your neighbors will laugh at you.
If that is fine by you, then feel free, but I doubt that once the people accept my logic that you will be able to find anybody that wants to go back to this dystopia.

Loading...