The consensus that formed to fix the DOA and refund the ether, that one. In that respect, ETC went against consensus and touted immutability as above consensus.
You're avoiding the obvious, ETC didn't form or have consensus. A community breaking into two isn't consensus, it's actually disagreement, not agreement, which is the simplest sense of consensus, general agreement.
Plz, as if it doesn't pertain to the topic or my initial query is a non query. The argument is that if consensus is above immutability then going against consensus to uphold immutability is shady as fuck. Case and point immutability can be used to empower or to exploit/take advantage of people, same with consensus, if ETH would have agreed to some unconscionable act it would violate the principles of integrity and good will which are above consensus and underpin most every community, except maybe ETC where 51% attacks are "consensus".
Immutability is a subset of consensus.
So then if consensus forms such in the case of ETH/ETC wouldn't the later be putting the carriege before the horse?
Posted using Partiko Android
Both ETH and ETC have consensus.
BTC has consensus as well.
We already know the answer.
Number of miners in favor of a rollback because Binance got hacked for 0.04% of all Bitcoins:
0%
What consensus are you talking about?
The latter of what?
Immutability
ISthe consensus.The consensus that formed to fix the DOA and refund the ether, that one. In that respect, ETC went against consensus and touted immutability as above consensus.
Communities form consensus.
One cell can become two cells.
One community can become two communities.
You're avoiding the obvious, ETC didn't form or have consensus. A community breaking into two isn't consensus, it's actually disagreement, not agreement, which is the simplest sense of consensus, general agreement.
Posted using Partiko Android
You don't have an argument or a question.
#trolled
Plz, as if it doesn't pertain to the topic or my initial query is a non query. The argument is that if consensus is above immutability then going against consensus to uphold immutability is shady as fuck. Case and point immutability can be used to empower or to exploit/take advantage of people, same with consensus, if ETH would have agreed to some unconscionable act it would violate the principles of integrity and good will which are above consensus and underpin most every community, except maybe ETC where 51% attacks are "consensus".
Agree to Disagree
An oxymoron. Agreement is not disagreement. Agreeing to disagree, why not simply tell me that you disagree.
#trololol
Posted using Partiko Android