You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A VERY dark theory about Israel...Are useful idiots helping in the final solution?
Casualties from what? I’m not understanding how there are any casualties without war.
In Australia at least motor vehicle casualties are much higher in rural areas that the cities.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Suicide rates too. Much higher in isolated areas.
Posted using Partiko iOS
....why are you diverting away from the point of my post?
I’m not diverting at all. You say the “how” doesn’t matter, but it does!
You make a fundamental incorrect assumption that concentration increases casualties.
It might seem reasonable on first blush, but on detailed examination of possible “hows” it proves the opposite.
The dangers of concentration is the lynchpin of your argument. If it’s wrong, everything else falls apart.
Posted using Partiko iOS
no in the slightest - biological warfare work better- where there are people.
Nuclear explosion kill more people -where there are people
Regular bombing kill more people -where there are people.
Are you missing something?
Health outcomes and fatalities are also much worse in low density rural area.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Biological warfare. (for example?)
You are delineating 'war' into something.
Something that was never brought up - except to say that the how is irrelevant.
As I said originally in my post - the how doesn't matter..
I was talking about a theory ( using logic and historical facts) to build a theory...
I don't think you are trying to move away from the point of the post - but if you are, why?
Lets keep it on topic, eh?
(you need to study some history then, matey!)
No war in communist Russia after the civil war - but how many million casualties there (40 million).
You don't need a 'war' to have casualties.