You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A VERY dark theory about Israel...Are useful idiots helping in the final solution?
If you’re not talking about war re concentration then what other method of killing populations are you taking about?
If you are (and your Dresden example is obviously war) then modern guided weapons make it just as easy to kill everyone in 100 isolated villages as the same people concentrated in a city.
But modern defensive systems can defend the city cost effectively but not the 100 isolated villages.
Equally a large country’s infrastructure is much more expensive and harder to protect. This is why the Israeli electricity grid is protected against EMP attack but US is not!
Civilian casualties in concentrated areas are higher than in spread out ares..
I never mentioned the military once....
...if you disagree with that theory fine.
..but I find it difficult to imagine that you can give me any example to the contrary of that theory - where sparse population zones will receive more casualties than densely populated zones..
See what I mean?
...this post has nothing to do with military deployment.
Casualties from what? I’m not understanding how there are any casualties without war.
In Australia at least motor vehicle casualties are much higher in rural areas that the cities.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Suicide rates too. Much higher in isolated areas.
Posted using Partiko iOS
....why are you diverting away from the point of my post?
I’m not diverting at all. You say the “how” doesn’t matter, but it does!
You make a fundamental incorrect assumption that concentration increases casualties.
It might seem reasonable on first blush, but on detailed examination of possible “hows” it proves the opposite.
The dangers of concentration is the lynchpin of your argument. If it’s wrong, everything else falls apart.
Posted using Partiko iOS
no in the slightest - biological warfare work better- where there are people.
Nuclear explosion kill more people -where there are people
Regular bombing kill more people -where there are people.
Are you missing something?
Health outcomes and fatalities are also much worse in low density rural area.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Biological warfare. (for example?)
You are delineating 'war' into something.
Something that was never brought up - except to say that the how is irrelevant.
As I said originally in my post - the how doesn't matter..
I was talking about a theory ( using logic and historical facts) to build a theory...
I don't think you are trying to move away from the point of the post - but if you are, why?
Lets keep it on topic, eh?
(you need to study some history then, matey!)
No war in communist Russia after the civil war - but how many million casualties there (40 million).
You don't need a 'war' to have casualties.