You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A VERY dark theory about Israel...Are useful idiots helping in the final solution?
Actually concentration of forces is still a key military principle. Even with nukes its applicable as nukes have a limited range and armoured forces are well protected against them. Tactical nukes have a quite small blast radius and would only directly take out a few tanks or APCs spaced 100m apart. Most infantry inside armoured vehicles with the protection from blast, heat and radiation that provides.
A massed concentration of forces was still a key military principle back in 1913, in Europe
But from 1914 to 1918, their old military logic was proved to be woefully incorrect due to firepower.(new technology)
Nuke firepower (new technology) trumps any other firepower available, and to a massive degree..
....do you think that's an incorrect perspective? If so , how?
Concentration of force is still a key military doctrine. http://www.defencesynergia.co.uk/british-principles-of-war-are-they-applied-in-21st-century-uk-defence-policy-and-planning/
We are moving away from the point, I think...
Even in a conflict involving WMDs forces still need to concentrate in the offense. https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/doctrine/army/fm3-100/CH10.PDF Missile defence systems like Israel has negate the need to disperse forces as they can take out the WMDs.
...what if they're designed to fail..?
Or the Twin Towers.