RE: A VERY dark theory about Israel...Are useful idiots helping in the final solution?
I think its all a bit more complicated than you describe here.
True is, that Jews have been over average successful in business. But I doubt that its a matter of intelligence. One key factor is, that Jews have always formed closed communities, inside which they supported each other. That is a good receipe for success, if other people act as lone wolfs and make each other's life difficult. That has sometime led to envy, anti jewish resentment and even open violence.
Another factor was the bible and the catholic church. In the bible its the jewish who were responsible for the death of Jesus. And since the vast majority of people since the early medival time were catholics - often to a level of mental illness - there was always a furtile ground for distrust, or even hatred, towards Jews.
But the issues with the Jews taking over Palestine are even more complex. There is certainly no visible intention (by the British, who ruled Palestine at the time) to prepare a homestead for the Jews. Its a long story, and I recommend that you read up on the developement of the Zionist movement beginning in the late 19th century, until the founding of the state of Israel in 1948.
To make it clear: I am also opposed to the current conduct of the Israeli government. Its very disappointing to see how they, of all people, treat the Palestinians as a lower lifeform. That is just as unacceptable as it was when the Germans did this with the Jews during the Nazi era.
On the other hand, I can understand that the Israelis are scared. For one because of their history, but also because they are surrounded by enemies (more or less outspoken ones). For them, there is no plan B to holding what they have now. Even if the explaination that this was the land given to them by God some thousand years ago is more than lame.
But things are as they are. If all the historical wrong doings would be reversed today, the world would end in total chaos. The only thing we can do is, to avoid more of this nonsense in the future.
You points are all valid, I was just throwing out the theory....
That support the theory more than dismisses it . Having 'nothing' enables a socialist dependent state - dependent on external forces.
I would disagree with IQ question.
... actions of a society with higher IQ's.
Ashkenazi Jews (studies range from 104 to 115; the IQ of Sephardic Jews is estimated to be the same as Northern Europeans) 110
IQ is the scientific measure we have of intelligence, thereof the only one we can use
( a societal group measure , not as predictor of individuals -that is a incorrect use of the tool.).
Thanks for the comment.
There was certainly a socialist element in the early jewish communities in Palestine. A fair amount of jews were desillusioned communists that had fled from the Stalin terror in the Soviet Union. One clearly communist brain child were the Kibbuzim, the early jewish settlements.
But I don't see a big master plan behind all that. It was certainly not the intention of the British to loose control in Palestine and get involved in a civil war, ending with the need to withdraw from there.
And keep in mind, before WW2 the USA did have almost no role in the middle east, unlike today.
I think the whole IQ thing is overrated.
It is always a advantage to have the support of a community, thats basically how the human race has developed.
That its not a IQ related thing, is shown by the fact that it works for all kinds of people. Just as a example: the Freemasons and the Mafia, or student associations. Its always good to have connections and backup in rough times.
that' snot an argument against the legitimacy of IQ without knowing the IQ's in any said group first.
Agreed - to what extent this is IQ related is not known.
Clever people see the benefits of group security...
(seeing the benefits of this proposition - is conceptual in it's nature - concepts reside in the realms of higher IQ's)