Instead of wikipedia please link some scientific data showing the world temperature increasing in any meaningful way and how this is linked to CO2 production. 'Scientific opinion' is not science.
Instead of wikipedia please link some scientific data showing the world temperature increasing in any meaningful way and how this is linked to CO2 production. 'Scientific opinion' is not science.
scroll to the bottom of the wiki page?
Excellent advice. Thank you. I'll sort through 135 references because I'm sure you've done that already and have your position backed up by raw data. So glad you educated me on this....
iv not gone through all of them no. but iv seen enough data over the years to know that man made climate change is real. but fuck me right... and almost all climate scientists because what the fuck would they know about it. that said here is some data that you didn't have to look for and easily find yourself. https://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm
Let me put it simply for you. Science is another word for 'The Scientific Method.' The Scientific Method is this: Hypothesis, then experiment, then conclusion. Without that, you have no science. Now explain to me how you experiment with the climate? You can't because it is impossible for us to do. Therefore there is no 'Climate Science' and no 'Climate Scientists.' There ARE scientists whose salaries depend upon them trying to make man made climate change appear legitimate.