You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: THE FLAT EARTH CON – BOLLOCKS 101
Not true. There is absolutely relevance to their fakery. It means that you can't trust one of the key organizations that supposedly gives you "real" evidence of a round Earth.
Of course it doesn't follow that the Earth is flat automatically because these pricks are fraudulent, but it certainly makes all their Earth model stories incredibly suspect. This includes all their supposed photos of Earth from space which are all photoshopped... and very provably photoshopped I might add.
This would all be so easy to prove - just film from a plane flying over the edge of the dinner plate, then drop under the dinner plate and film the underneath
Atomic bombs are fake too. But that doesn't make the earth flat...
Feel free to hire a plane to fly across Antarctica. Just get some damn good insurance and some serious winter survival gear.. ;-)
It's not me who has something to prove...
Are you implying me? I'm not a flat Earther.. I am Earth model agnostic. ;-) My only point is that I've invested a lot of time in actually listening to and thinking about all the arguments that are given by the flat Earthers. This includes real empirical evidence from on the ground experimentation. There is nothing that proves it's round from this - seriously nothing. This means we are trusting the NASholes on their model. I'm not comfortable with that either.
I have simply posted very compelling anecdotal evidence that I think is worth thinking about as well. What that leaves us with however is not proof, but only helps clarify some of the evidence available on the opposite side of the fence from where you are sitting at this point. We both already know the evidence from the round model perspective anyway.
@newsandviews YUP.