You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Fuckery?

in #conspiracy7 years ago

Thanks for your in-depth response, brother! I'm guessing if you are anything like me, that you have an open mind and enjoy contemplating viable arguments of significant merit on a broad range of topics.

As such, I thought I'd share two such arguments that I found worthy of contemplation. Enjoy brother!

Why Science is Just Like a Religion

and Evolution is NOT JUST HIGHLY UNLIKELY, it's IMPOSSIBLE! - part 1

If you're not too stuck in dogma, perhaps we'll be closer to 50/50 after your consideration in light of the above. Not that anyone gives a hoot either way, but mostly for the purposes of sharing rather plausible and at times quite compelling insights...

Sort:  

I've blogged on Sheldrake a few times here on Steemit. I think he's correct in his overall assessment that science writ large has become reductionist, but this is because a core group of scientists rejects philosophically any other possibility or teleology when it comes to hidden 'drives' within the universe. This group of scientists is wrong, IMO...but this goes to weak and strong atheism--agnostic atheism is defensible whereas gnostic atheism is over-reach. Having said that, the burden of evidence for any spiritual teleology HAS NOT been met--not as far as I can see. It doesn't mean it's not there but it means anyone's claims about such things or processes has to be speculative until such a time that whatever is driving the universe from a spiritual perspective becomes known in an indisputable way.
On Johnston: if he is going to argue for some unknown 'hand' as the driving force of existence then I may be sympathetic to him; if however, his assertions come attached to any of the tens and thousands of religious dogmas then the guys full of shit! I suspect his theism is wrapped up tightly in one of the over 30,000 versions of Christianity. That position is untenable and dishonest; again, if he is framing his arguments within some 'undefinable' god theory then he may have a case, but anyone asserting science attached to spirituality and religious/cultural tradition specifically is practicing fuckery.
Specifically, if he is claiming biological Natural Selection as non-existent then he's dead wrong; if he's saying that non-biological evolution is problematic then I'd agree he has some valid concerns. Evolution does get misrepresented and no more so than the current economic models which have taken over the planet.
Now, I'm on the side of the fence that​ is suggesting that human evolution has been tampered with by Celestial archons but its metaphysical speculation as I can't prove my argument; also, my argument is​ not attached to any religious tradition all of which I view as fuckery to varying degrees.

Well-grounded thoughts, brother... Thanks for sharing!

Regardless of classification, with the never-ending abundance of “fuckery” throughout the past, present, and most certainly, the future, one is indeed quite challenged to believe anything spewed forth in the mainstream flow of banter and discourse – and as such, one must rely upon their own intellect in concert with the tools and resources available to them, if they are so inclined, to draw their own conclusions based upon conflicting evidence vs. that which is and has been presented by the powers that be or status quo as it were.

In light of the above, I leave you and your readers my last plausible level of high fuckery of the utmost disdain, and it surrounds the plausible controversy surrounding the “Moon Landing.”

If nothing else, it is most certainly entertaining and very much food for critical thought… Skeptically contemplating such assertions in my view, is healthy, and opens the pathways to a more robust mind and set of critical thinking skills that is all to absent in modern-day civilization.

Enjoy!

It wouldn't surprise me at all that the CIA used Kubrick to do scenes. That wouldn't necessarily mean they didn't go to the moon. But there are different issues here: are the world's governments corrupt as fuck? Well, ask any ANCAP Voluntaryist and I'd agree with them if they answered yes.
But this guy read the Bible 5-times in 5-years and wasn't able to conclude that it's one of the most full of shit books ever written? Really? That is fuckery by definition! Serpents can talk? Donkeys too? Eating your children as punishment for transgression? The insane irrationality of The Chosen People doctrine and the psychopathic parenting involved in such a notion. Eternal damnation one strike and you're out and, oh, the irony of American Christian's who have such a love for baseball--truly the blind leading the blind. Look, when any one​ of these guys go 'Bible' in any context other than to say it's one of the most irrational and illogical books ever written then you know there is fuckery involved.
And then there is the near complete lack of archeological evidence for the stories therein...Yikes!
Nope, IMO., The Bible along with all those other religious books are the High Fuckery of what I call Gnostic Archons--or, like I mentioned before if one is a Christian--The Nephilim theory but just add in that you and your precious book have been duped too! And I don't mean that you as personal to you--I'm speaking generally.

haha... Somehow, I knew you'd focus on the biblical references...

Casting that aspect aside, the fact that NASA states they are unable to return for insufficient technological reasons, and that they've "lost" / "destroyed" all of the telemetry data in concert with the fact that no one's been back in 45 years - makes for one of the juiciest potential fuckeries of all time.

Now, granted, I have an open mind and cling to nothing, nor am I married to any set of rigid concepts or beliefs - and I suspect you take a similar stance.

"Now when we get to human DNA is where I'd say there is High Fuckery going on, but the Archons who've done this have made it so that we can only speculate on it as they control the power centers. People like John Mack have offered up compelling anecdotal or circumstantial evidence though for some kind of interventionist fuckery from archonic entities. I sit in the 'they are Celestial beings camp' as the nature of this mess means I can't prove my claim so I have to frame it as speculation (honesty within inquiry"...)

I'd be interested to know the depths of what set of rabbit-holes you traversed in order for you to give such weighted credence to the Archons (though you admit it's pure speculation). Now that's out there, bro... At least on the surface from a layman's perspective... :-)

If (and it's a big if) the moon is an E.T. base then, of course, there is High Fuckery going on there. See some of the comments below for more on that issue. Gotta run...