You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why Did @neal.leo Downvote You?

in #curation6 years ago

You're making dead PoB more dead.

This is a dumb argument. The process of deciding whether a piece of content is on-topic or off-topic is the definition of Proof of Brain.

Unless it's officially prohibited from your community, if you don't remove your downvote, you are probably doing something wrong.

Welcome to decentralized freedom.

Technically it's also related to investment. due to tag order problem people may not want to use nitrous/scot, worth of tokens will be going down.

If you had a portion of your post that detailed the investment ramifications of the changes to the code, then yes it would be on-topic. See Step Two:

A news post about a company? Downvote
A news post about a company and how that will effect its forward earnings and share price? Upvote

Sort:  

beneficiary info wan't shown before, which is investment related right or not?

you expected to receive something but received less, then you may feel deceived.

In any sense, my previous post is also related to investment.

I'm a very logical person, unless it's a mistake, I also care which tags should be included.

BENEFICIARY IS INVESTMENT INFO you should admit that.

It's still your freedom to downvote, but care about contents and people. You're losing more of your investment otherwise.

People may not like LEO anymore if there are too many unjustified downvotes.