RE: "STEEM-TWITTER CAMPAIGN HAS NOT BEEN A FAILURE"
Hey guys @nonsowrites @robertandrew and anyone else who reads this comment. I honestly think you've got the wrong impression from his tweet, and that's not surprising as it's easily misconstrued.
He mentions linkseven77 being a failed project. The linkseven77 project was not the Twitter marketing drive, but his idea to make a steem LinkedIn, this is how I understand it anyway from speaking to him recently. When he announced the zweeet77 (twitter campaign) I'm pretty sure he said the focus was shifting away from linkseven77 and that it wasn't necessary to use that tag in steem posts anymore etc
I'm sure @nathanmars will drop by this post at some point to confirm, or refute what I'm saying lol but I'm fairly certain I'm right about this. Anyway, I hope this might help clarify things.
P.s. I just wanted to add that what you're saying in this video is spot on. It has been a great success in regards to getting people marketing steem on twitter... Big time. Especially when you consider that many Steemians, me included, were completely inactive on fbook/twitter before this campaign, as they're (fbook/twitter) the past and We're (steem) the future. But this doesn't mean we don't need to go let everyone know on twitter what they're missing out on 🙂
Well, thanks for pointing that out. My thought was that the link777 was/is an initiative to connect individuals and projects and promote them on Twitter to attract angel investors. The whole idea was to get more eyes on steem. I remember suggesting to him that we try Instagram but he said the project was geared towards Twitter since we have more crypto enthusiasts there. So I think the linkseven77 was the Twitter campaign but it's constantly redefined. Well, I hope Nath clarifies things. But the bottom line is that we stay focused and not get distracted by any setbacks. That's the point I am trying to make in this video