You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Socialism and communism, two different things.
Good luck selling that, too many dead grandpas and uncles.
Any system that requires force is doomed.
Only a voluntarily adopted better solution will fly for more time than it takes to overturn it.
Violence is the preferred option to rule because it can only be escaped by bigger violence.
New boss, same as the old boss, but quicker to anger.
The workers hold their destiny in their hands, but have no clue to their real power.
Keep working, stop paying, short circuits the whole shebang.
On any given tuesday,...
dead ppl, yes. I will say that we have the biggest grassroots groundswell and "audience participation though.
you speak of NatSoc not being voluntary but there is something to say about working together as a nation. In contrast to voluntary, in gives a better target. Patriarchy is the natural family state. I believe in building out a nation from there.
Have you ever heard that anarchy, which I believe is what some of you guys are calling volunteerism, is the end state of Communism?
Touche and all but, no centralization or anarchy or extreme libertarianism is too unwieldy. Yes NatSoc is unsavory to most people but the victors wrote the history. I am not advocating a violent purge of any groups. I am advocating reworking a system that is a middle way between the two real world extremes.
I may never see it but I do not think you will see your system either if we're being realistic. We both have huge obstacles to do anything. We would be lucky to but achieve much more than respective "communes."
cheers for now.
You should look at my page, it will help you see to whom you speak.
Your understanding of communism is not the only one.
Here is a viewpoint on the topic you likely havent been exposed to.
I dont doubt your take on the nazis, all that bad press is troublesome to any serious inquiry.
In fact, your commune is not prohibited in my book, feel free, but forgive me if i choose to maintain some distance.
True beliebers, of any type, are often unreasonable.
Here is a purview, from 1887, that may help your introspection.
eh... That's a few hour read.
My observation on Communism and Anarchism is that while in actuality the Commies ruled with an Iron Fist, they did so bc they were more or less training and regimenting people for the State to wither away. It may have but, it would have been done through Black Market Rackets.
IDK, that book you linked to seemed somewhat too positive, too positive in a way that makes me think it's a come on and more or less propagandizing through unworkable ideals.
It's not an anarchy book but it might be an analogy. Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" is a great piece of propaganda in that most people don't realize it's a come on. Then all of a sudden, people are reading Von Mises et. al. and smitten with Libertarianism. Rand stokes the ego of people who are somewhat above average but not versed in propaganda.