You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: "Free Range" parenting, and pothead parents...CPS in a bind.

in #familyprotection7 years ago (edited)

You said:

It is clear that children left to wander at whatever age in whatever neighborhood at whatever time is a recipe for disaster, no matter your political beliefs. But, this is a growing "thing" with many powerful liberals/progressives adopting this "parenting philosophy,"

That is not my understanding from all that I have read about "Free Range Parenting." I think that most of them are more on the conservative side. They just believe that children should be allowed to be children, like in days gone by.

They believe that the actual statistics of the dangers of allowing children outdoors to play in their community, do not align with the fear tactics that are pushed on us by media, etc. They don't want to lock up their children in the house with their entertainment choices being limited to computers and TV.

These days CPS takes children away from parents just because the parents let them walk to school by themselves, or play at the park alone down the street.
Obviously each parent knows not to let really young children like toddlers out on their own, and each parent judges their own child's capabilities and responsibility level before giving them the level of freedom that they are able to handle.

(Ca-Co)

Sort:  

Ah...OK! Thanks for clarifying. I misread that whole thing I guess. Not quite as funny as my "Crown Prosecution Services" gaffe, but...The term "free-range" just struck me as a "liberal"(i.e. unbalanced) idea... i.e. children as just another form of livestock, and all...lol....

Still, the conundrum is still there for CPS with regard to "profiling" poor parents, and dealing with the ongoing legalization of more and more recreational drugs over time--which was/are the bigger points of my article, IMO.

Thanks C-C.

OK!
Yeah, 'free-range' chickens get outdoors and eat bugs and explore their neighbourhoods, but always come back to a safe coop where they are protected for the night and cared for.
Non-'free-range' chickens just get locked up all day long with zero exercise, to live in their own poop, etc.

I think that is the picture they were going for by calling it 'free-range'.

Makes sense.

I'm still sticking by the rest of my article though...lol...

My point about CPS supporters blatantly "profiling for profit" while wrapping themselves in a very public liberal/progressive personae in which they vehemently decry LEO "profiling" is so egregious it should result in major sanctions, IMHO.