Dear @sabbirakib, below is the detailed assessment of your submission.
Criteria | Marks | Remarks |
---|---|---|
Story start to finish | 4.7/5 | Good |
Originality & Uniqueness | 2.9/3 | Good |
Presentation | 1/1 | Excellent |
My observation | 0.9/1 | I felt you softened Dev's character too much. |
Total | 9.5/10 |
Feedback
- You did well in building suspense by involving the chairman and turning the spotlight on Robin but you shifted the main focus away from the clash between Teena's rigid honesty and Dev's risk-taking style. Instead, the focus went more on Robin's fraud.