Dear @samuelbrilliant, below is the detailed assessment of your submission.
| Criteria | Marks | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Story start to finish | 4.65/5 | Good |
| Originality & Uniqueness | 1.5/3 | Satisfactory |
| Presentation | 0.9/1 | Good |
| My observation | 0.85/1 | The flashback scene wasn't expanded, even though the original prompt placed weight on it. |
| Total | 7.9/10 |
Feedback
- Your ending was soft and hopeful, but it avoided the element of surprise or big twist that could have made it stand out more.
@waqarahmadshah, How do you expect all of this to be done under 800 words, if I had exceeded the limit to give you the full story comprising of everything that is missing, you would still come here and disqualify me, I don't know how you expect us to write and expand every prompt given and not exceeding the word limit, the same was done in the week before last, and instead of the participant to be penalised, he went on to win, it shows favouritism which should not be so.
0.00 SBD,
0.01 STEEM,
0.01 SP
Your story was good, but you lost some crucial marks in the originality section.
Cc: @dove11
You should read the contest post which forbids you from using AI. You should read my reports which clearly state that we ignore mentioning AI use by the contestant in our remarks until someone questions our decisions.
And not only our contests posts including the last week, you have been posting using AI in other communities too which as a newcomer's team booming1 member I have checked and kept records of.
@waqarahmadshah