You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Saw this on Twitter....
A Doctorate in fluid tension dynamics explained it to me. It is nt "garbage. " I really cannot hold a conversation with someone who resorts to Ad Hominem or any other fallacious arguments. Not to say you outright lost the round, simply that you are not capable of debate.
Take it easy PB. A lack of training in classical logic is regular nowadays and there are no real insults here.
you are appealing to authority...
you are not holding a conversation, your attempting to talk over my head.
but i know what you said doesn't make any sense.
no, i'm just saying your wrong, flat out.
you claim your right, i'm saying you don't know what your talking about, then you tell me you don't because you got it from
there is such a thing as water tension, which is why water droplets form.. .but it doesn't apply to large lake or ocean.
go back to your friend, find out what he means, because you obviously didn't get it right.
then find a way to say it and prove it without saying 'because i'm so smart, you don't get it'
Read the piece on Foucalt's Pendulum in full if you are able to look at that. It behaves along the same mathematical premises as a gyroscope coming to a stop. In different parts of the world both simple machines act differently. Yet the exact motion can be predicted bases on its placement on the face of the earth. The math is relatively simple and predicts the same behavior from the object resisting gravity (gyro) and the object succumbing to gravity (pendulum). The Earth's oceans are not an exact "egg" because of land masses. Other planets have exact "egg" masses of water. When we look really far away, through a telescope or microscope, the theories break down. Molecules larger than mountains within neutrino stars or super-symmetric z-bosons tell us that our math and science are fundamentally wrong to begin with. Google sea level variances, sea level is not one thing.
While oceans are not made up of heavy water or long-chain molecules, surface tension most definitely applies to them. I simply do not know enough to conclude for sure if the earth is flat or spherical, but I would bet there is a third, more accurate, description to be yet discovered. As long as everyone believes it is a sphere, that option will not be discovered.
Okie, gotta admit I might have been wrong. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/globalsl.html There is no explanation of the sea level variance and it has only been published (mostly) by one government organization. It was verbally explained to me, and in an elegant manner, but I have not seen actual evidence. This is a probably a flat earth point, with so little info. Like NASA took 2 pictures of the planet Earth in 70 years? Why? Not siding, but the variable sea level has data showing the measurement, but incomplete data showing the variable. Explanation: No real science to explain......
my understanding is sea level is sea level across the globe, once accounted for tides and such.
being wrong isn't a crime, being able to admit it is amazingly brave in this day and age.
to me, proving me wrong just helps me get rid of false data. so i am happy if you can prove me wrong. only by talking to with many and allowing my ideas to be put into the fire of online debate can i be sure that i have correct information.
to be honest, i'm glad to find real people.. so tired of talking to paid schills, but i figure others are reading it so it is worth my time. take care and good luck in your journey to discover truth !
A 4D planet is not flat or round.....That is where I am right now. Water seeks it's own level....never arrives there.
why do you think you could know this absolutely?
sure it does. we see lakes in perfect calm states look like a mirror. we so no concave/convex curve happening. so it is level.
sea level is the same everywhere, one you account for the tides.
i don't see the relevancy of either of these statements you made here.