You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bill Belichick refuses to answer!🏈🏈🏈
which is stand on the podium and say words, but not give any actual information.
Actualy, I support it at some point. First of all, I know exactly how mainstream media love to twist things around. They may not do it at that moment, but remember, everything is recorded and stored. Eventually, at some point, it all can be used against him whether the decision was right or wrong.
Watching Super Bowl I was actually wondering. After few hours I let it go. Now that you have made a post about it I searched it a bit...
I'd actually like to see Robert Kraft step up and fire him, lol.
At the end, I’m certain they usually do discuss every major move being done. Otherwise, Belichick would be already gone.
Ya, it can be a combination of little reasons and not one single reason.
Note the Tweet you're showing is from February 5, day after the game. That was his impression at that time, but maybe today he wouldn't break it down quite like that.
The benching isn't super weird right off the bat, because you assume the reasons for it would come to light, and that it would be confirmed that he wasn't healthy or what rule he broke etc. But then if things don't get confirmed and teammates all support him and don't seem to understand why he didn't play, it grows more weird and mysterious.
Today I think most people would put things like "Bill wanted to make a statement" somewhere in the pie chart.