---

Dear AI

I hope this letter finds you in good spirit and I would really love to read your reply to this letter. As you may have already noticed in the tone and choice of words that permeates this letter as I vent out my frustrations and concerns.

Dear AI, You did not fall out of the sky, you are a product of our best brains refined over time, but it seems you think you are better, forgetting we made you.

I am so sorry, I don't feel like mincing words here, but I will call a cat a cat, because you feel all well-written composition are yours. Whenever the tenses are correct, with proper punctuation and an accurate grammatical structure, you believe it is yours.

You only know grammar because we taught you. But now, all the good grammar is yours. Any write-up that uses the right term, terminology or register to explain facts straight to the point is claimed by you. Maybe you will also claim this one if i write it well enough.

Do you really think we can't make five correct sentences that are straight to the point in a single paragraph?

Please stop claiming credit for our work, it huts. stop looking down on our intelligence as if we did not make you. stop claiming my work, I wrote them myself.

Let's take a recent example. The text below is an excerpt from one of my current posts about insects and pollination. And here I was explaining the pollination process.

On a typical day, a butterfly or bee will visit the flower in search of nectar or pollen. While collecting nectar, a good amount of pollen gets attached to the little hairs on the bee or butterfly. When it flies over to another flower, it is still searching for nectar, but the pollen that got stuck to the insect now gets transferred to the flower's stigma and pollination is completed. The plant can now produce seeds and fruits.

You now flagged it as AI-generated text, simply because the structure was clear, the tone was formal, and the technical vocabulary I used was apt and on point.

Had it been I had to beat about the bush, throwing in some slang and go for descriptions instead of mentioning correct names like nectar, pollen, pollenation and stigma, which are the most appropriate terms in this context, you would not have claimed it as yours.

It becomes worse if I use a spell-checking software and accept its suggested corrections at such instances, you stamp in your signatures and claim it as yours.
The whole idea was mine; I wrote it myself, and you only did some minor corrections when I asked you to spell-check. Are you not guilty of intellectual property theft?

Dear AI and your AI detector cousin, in Conclusion, I do appreciate your work and the assistance you have provided to us writers, but please note that some platforms do not welcome AI-generated text at this time. So when you are asked to scan my work, I would really appreciate it if you avoid false positive ratings of my work.

I will make this letter available as carbon copies to the following friends @bossj23, @okere-blessing, @josepha, @marianaceleste and @rubee2as1

Yours sincerely

@manuelhooks

Media Credit

Composer	@manuelhooks
To	AI Ditectors
Captured with	Galaxy-A15
Posting Date	Thursday. 28 August
	(@) 2025