You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Kontes Komentar: Kuantitas atau Kualitas? -21 SP Untuk 7 Orang [ID-EN] Comment Contest: Quantity or Quality? - 21 SP for 7 Users
You suggested that they should give up on Sec? I guess they don't tolerate AI and plagiarism at all. The problem we're facing is that some people are not making any effort to write. For instance, when there's a question to answer, instead of doing research and understanding the topics, they simply use AI to generate the answers. It's all about relying on AI instead of engaging in human thought, which has led to laziness. I use AI, no doubt, but I don't depend on it.
What do you mean? SEC doesn't exist since months! 8 or 9 by now!
You are part of those who didn't make any effort, remember the SEA project?
So your excuses are as good as theirs.
Thediarygame, SEC and moderators killed all creativity with their rules. Now we are a mass producer of bad content wrapped in the same layout, hundreds of posts with red questions + the same answers given by people without an opinion. After years not one of them developed a niche, a writing style or a personal blog and there's no way to find posts back because of hashtag abuse, disinterest and using hashtags no sane person would use to find a certain text...
And now we have AI.
Why should one invest a topic? 80% of what is posted on internet is old or fake info. I read the biggest nonsense spread. Read the topics of the challengers. There's no expertise and if that's the case it's better to make a fun challenge out of each topic since that is what the platform lacks: fun, a positive vibe.
What you find here are low educated people 50-80 years behind if if it comes to the modern world/logic.
If tasks are too difficult it's not strange they ask help from AI. They have no clue what is asked and the same counts for me.
Since this is all triggered by the small chance to receive an upvote it's better to give up on it and force people to use their brain and connect with others.
The AI users still win challenges
How come you don't reply to this @mhizta?
Oh, I meant to share my thoughts the day I received the reply, but I forgot. I might feel like a prodigal son, no doubt. I attempted two sea projects, but I couldn't meet the required standards. It's understandable why that might be disappointing, but I was dealing with some discouraging factors at the time, and I kept complaining about it.
My recommendation for newcomers is to join the project because it can be very beneficial for them. I see it like taking out a loan to start a business. At one point, I considered returning to sea mining, but I felt unworthy of it. What if I fail again?
Is it the fear of failing? If that's the case how come you can comment to newcomers and with me?
It would fit into the goal you set or?
Might be good to talk about the disappointing aspects.
You know where to find me.
I'm not that scared about failing. It's not me, but the person who gave me the chance. Honestly, if I had the opportunity, I would join.
Then ask to join
It is because I have resolved the problem, and I have something to work on every day. I think that's my new recent improvement
When discussing AI, it's important to recognize that opinions can vary greatly because some people misuse it. AI was intended to provide guidelines and inspiration, which means it can be used positively. Many contests require research, and I also rely on it for that purpose. Much of what I know today comes from my research efforts.
We shouldn't blame everyone for the actions of a few lazy users who simply copy from AI. Two people can understand the same concept, but their explanations will differ, and that’s where misunderstandings can occur.
You forget something very important, AI makes up answers, makes non existing conclusions. It's not exactly the dictionary or encyclopedia. It takes its info from a certain part (for sure not the entire internet let alone good books) of the internet, old info and adds the rest.
The biggest danger is that its taken for the truth.
Like it is with all inventions meant for the good, this one is abused (not that I believe this is meant to only do good but to control, brainwash and implent woke ideas.
How many users check more than 4 sources, think after they received the AI comment andbsay: this, this and that part doesn't make sense?
Why do you join contests you have no knowledge about or experiences with?
I view a contest similarly to homework assigned by a teacher. Often, the homework may not directly relate to what was taught in class, which means students need to research the topic and explain their understanding of it. When the time comes for presentations, those who did the research will be prepared to share their knowledge and answer questions confidently.
For me, contests are particularly interesting, especially when they involve topics related to health. I take the initiative to research these subjects. My motivation for researching goes beyond just wanting to win a contest or gather votes; it's about enhancing my own understanding. When I encounter a contest topic that is challenging, I invest time in research to learn and comprehend it better.
In my entries, I'll typically mention that I found the topic difficult at first, but through my research, I was able to grasp various concepts and insights.
I’ve gained valuable knowledge from participating in contests because they require me to explore and learn more about different subjects.
If you would always write that I wouldn't believe one word of it. Everyone can write this, but that doesn't matter it's the case. Did you really learn? Will you know this information AI provided in 1 or 5 years from now on?
I would say: everyone his own fun, but I don't see it as valuable if you post what everyone can ask AI or find on the internet. It doesn't make this platform valuable and why pay for what we can find with a click?
Why do we need to go to school or college when we can easily read it online and learn?
Because the government want everyone to have the same info brain washed in and make the parents pay for it?
You could learn on the internet if you could tell the difference between nonsense be told and something you can work with (nonsense, scam seems to be the right tool for a very large group).
Everything we did in the past we can no longer and is called wrong as soon as the governments stick his nose in and sees a way to make money out of it. Driver's license, art, you name it.