Sort:  

Thank you for the Upvote Sir @wilmer1988 but there is nothing wrong with that first post you voted on. It's just that some people will wake up and decide to do things based on assumptions. She labelled me Ai use suspicious with no valid evidence and I've requested for a reason which she hasn't given until now. You can check the post yourself if it's Ai relative. Even though you removed the post because of two an existing curator vote there, I still have to voice out because the labeller hasn't replied to me yet. I'm not making a rash decision. It's just that even I as a moderator won't label someone without concrete evidence.

@wakeupkitty see what your label has caused? I feel this is just getting started because that post features me in my project and seminar defense. I'll defend myself to the last and I'll make sure that justice is served in that particular post and label. I know you are in position of authority but that doesn't stop me from voicing out. The upcoming generation can't learn ways that won't better the society when the finally become future leaders.

Until you give me a valid reply, I'll continue tagging you. That's how I'll follow this injustice you served me to the end. I'll follow it squarely till justice is served. I'll also continue tagging the Admins in that community until one person replies me.

@steembetterlife
@heriadi
@irawandedy