Your writing is too much for me to understand, when I think you are talking about someone, I see that you have moved on to another point and I cannot understand it.
My way of understanding is very similar to my way of writing.
Your writing is too much for me to understand, when I think you are talking about someone, I see that you have moved on to another point and I cannot understand it.
My way of understanding is very similar to my way of writing.
It's a bit complicated. Because I use a technique, something like stream of consciousness, everything might happen at the psychic level, or several conversations might intertwine in parallel worlds, and an omniscient narrator might try to bring order to the chaos. Still, the level of reality jumps from one paragraph to the next.
I remember that Harold Pinter, a Nobel Prize winner, used something like this in his unfinished novel, THE DWARVES.
Although, when I write, I don't really think about any style or technique. It must be, at least for me, fluid. Something that comes naturally to me. Otherwise, there would be perceptible breaks. Novels must be carefully woven together, otherwise you run the risk of delivering chapters with different levels of quality, which is noticeable.
And as Anatole France (another Nobel Prize winner, by the way) said, success is achieved by reading, reading, and reading.
I could give you a list of what you shouldn't miss. Lots of incredible literature. Xd. My mind is filled with hundreds of books.
I'm happy for you. On the other hand, I only remember the books that I have read because of the topics that I have liked since I was a child. Almost all of them are fictional, related to death, murders, suicides, accidents, investigations of all these cases. It's what always caught my attention.
I don't think I've ever read a book by a Nobel Prize winner, but I have read a book by many science fiction authors.