I laughed a lot with your witticisms. I really needed to laugh like that. You have been very creative with this original story of the three little pigs.
I think that when we are evaluated in groups is where the problem lies, because what they are evaluating is the result of a task, they are not evaluating how each one does it.
On the other hand, the mother already needed a break and she got it by kicking them all out of the house.
Coincidentally, I saw on YouTube a series of stories (generated or voiced by AI) about mothers being abused by children (often sons, HELP!) (fnancially stripped or worse to the point of poisoning). Now of course it is (boring) AI chatter but I find the reactions below it quite shocking.
There are also quite a few parents who remark that those who do too well are only plunged into misery.
Stories like the three little pigs can always be taken in more than one way. Don't you agree? Or am I the only one who always hears something different from what is meant?
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.08 SP
I think that everyone interprets a work according to what impacts them the most. It can also be the most striking from their point of view.
Everyone has different points of view in relation to a subject.
There is a saying that is said a lot in our country and it is: “Between tastes and colors have not written the authors” means that everyone interprets something, according to their preferences. There is no absolute truth in what we say or think.