You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SLC-S25/W3 | Community World Tour: Landscapes & Sacred Sites"
Thank you for your patience. Based on the official evaluation rubric for Community World Tour – Week 3: Landscapes & Sacred Sites, here is an assessment** of the post by @okere-blessing:
Evaluation Summary
Criteria | Score | Comments |
---|---|---|
1. Narrative & Cultural Meaning | 1.5 / 2.0 | The post shares strong cultural insights, including traditions, taboos, and the spiritual significance of the forest. The tone could be more emotionally vivid. |
2. Story of the Place | 1.5 / 2.0 | Solid storytelling about the war history and sacred uses of the forest. Some sections could benefit from smoother flow and clearer phrasing. |
3. Location + SteemAtlas Pin | 1.0 / 1.0 | Proper SteemAtlas coordinates are embedded. |
4. Photo (required) | 1.0 / 1.0 | The author shares multiple personal photos, including a selfie and contextual images of the forest and herbs. |
5. Drawing or Sketch | 1.0 / 1.0 | A hand-drawn map of the place is included and visible. |
6. TYPE LESS SMILE MORE Phrase | 1.0 / 1.0 | The poetic phrase is relevant and aligns well with the message of unity and culture. |
7. Community Engagement | 1.0 / 1.0 | The author actively engages in the comment section, particularly with @ninapenda, and provides detailed responses. |
8. Speak on Steem Video | 1.0 / 1.0 | A descriptive video is properly uploaded on Speem, featuring personal commentary that enriches the post's context. |
Final Score: 9.0 / 10
Remarks:
This is a meaningful and culturally rich contribution. The sacred forest is presented with respect and insight, and the author adds personal and family context. The video complements the post well. To enhance future entries, we recommend deeper emotional storytelling and smoother transitions.
Thank you for this authentic and informative participation in the World Tour!
— Community World Tour Jury
Thank you 🙏