Layer 1 vs Layer 2: Who Wins in 2025?

The problem of Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions is one of the most significant discussions when we are speaking about blockchain and cryptocurrency. This discussion is not merely a technological issue; it is a question concerning the future of the utilization of crypto in the day-to-day life. By 2025, the rivalry between these two layers will probably influence the speed, low-cost, and safety of blockchain. I am a Nigerian male who is closely interested in crypto, so this discussion is of great interest to me, and I wish to simplify it.

The first layer is the underlay of blockchain. These are Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and Cardano. They are the highways of where all the things take place. All the transactions, all smart contracts, all activities are stored right on the main blockchain. This provides Layer 1 blockchains with excellent security and decentralisation, yet it also causes them to be slow at times. As an example, Ethereum has experienced congestion where the gas charge has risen to prohibitive to an average user.

Patch Layer 2 on the other hand is constructed on top of Layer 1. These solutions attempt to correct the issue of speed and high cost by doing some of the transactions out of the main blockchain and then linking back to the blockchain. A case in point is the Lightning Network of Bitcoin and Polygon of Ethereum. Those enable larger numbers of individuals to utilize crypto at comparatively inexpensive and quicker speeds and not overload the primary chain.

The big question is: Who is going to achieve in 2025, however, Layer 1 or Layer 2?

Taking Layer 1, the most powerful point that can be made in its favor is security. It is not only the oldest which makes people trust Bitcoin, it has been tested over 10 years as invulnerable to attack. Even with its problems, Ethereum too has become the foundation of decentralized finance (DeFi) and NFTs. I believe in 2025, it will remain based on Layer 1 blockchains. They are the earth where all the buildings are founded. Without them there is nothing to make a building on.

Image Source

However, Layer 2 is simultaneously gaining significance due to the fact that crypto is shifting to mass adoption. Unless there is Layer 2, imagine the millions of people attempting to utilize Ethereum simultaneously. The system would choke. This is the reason why Layer 2 projects like Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and others have gained such popularity. They also provide their users with lower charges and quicker transactions even though they still have the benefits of the primary Ethereum system in terms of security.

In my case, the war between the two can be regarded as a parent and child relationship. The layer 1 offers the foundation, stability and the security. There is Layer 2 that offers speed, flexibility and creativity. I do not believe it will be a case of one winning and the other losing by the year 2025. Rather, it will be their combination that will result in the actual victory.

And another one to consider is Bitcoin. Critics have frequently lamented that Bitcoin is too expensive and slow to be used immediately. However, under the Lightning Network (a Layer 2 solution), Bitcoin can be transferred in almost no time with nearly no costs. This will make Bitcoin better with day-to-day payments. In the absence of this, Bitcoin can be no more than a store of value such as gold. However, in Layer 2, it is also possible to purchase something using a real currency. That is why I suppose that the future of Bitcoin is highly dependent on Layer 2.

The same can be said about Ethereum. Ethereum continues to experience high gas fees during rush hours, despite the upgrades. The solution to this problem is currently being addressed by Layer 2 solutions such as Polygon and Arbitrum, and by 2025, they will be even more robust. In case Ethereum continues to expand, it will be due to the effectiveness with which its Layer 2 partners can scale it out.

Others suggest that new Layer 1 blockchains such as Solana and Avalanche can achieve success by default due to being faster and cheaper than Ethereum. Although this is the case, I believe that they will continue to struggle with decentralization and long term security. The elder Layer 1s such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are experienced and trusted, and that is not something that you can purchase overnight.

Since I have already witnessed the Nigerians sending money, trading, and saving it in crypto, I understand that speed and low cost are highly valued. That is where Layer 2 shines. About every naira matters in a nation, no one desires paying 10 dollars worth of gas charges to transmit money. The second layer, layer 2, renders crypto more feasible to the common man.

So, who wins in 2025? In case I had to make a decision, I would tell you that Layer 2 is the star of the adoption, however, Layer 1 will always be the basis. The world will not be able to operate without secure base chains, yet, on the other hand, no one will adopt crypto in its full extent until the process will be fast and cheap. The existence of both is necessary, and Layer 2 will probably be in the limelight as it is close to the everyday lives of the users.

To sum up, there is really no problem of one layer replacing the other in the fight of Layer 1 vs Layer 2. A partnership is what we will be looking at in 2025. The former layer (Layer 1) will continue to be the foundation of security and trust, and the latter layer (Layer 2) will introduce speed and low cost that will make crypto useful to all. It will not necessarily be Layer 1 or Layer 2 as the actual winner although it will be the user who benefits to have faster, cheaper and more secure blockchain transactions.