You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is Unbiased Journalism Still Possible?
What comes first—food or morals?
If good, careful, and honorable journalists can't find a TV station, newspaper, or platform to publish their work, what do they do? They adapt...
They exist, these ambitious journalists. Their biggest problem is getting their voices heard beyond the prevailing narratives.
I did include the "food" aspect in my article initially but then removed it. It would have turned into a lengthy debate and pushed me to write more and more. So, I’m glad you pointed it out. Hmmm… foods versus morals—very interesting.
But what if all the "food" is exhausted before one even realizes the extent of the damage already inflicted?
Sooner or later, the truth does come out. I’ve become a strong believer in that. Whatever, however, whenever, it cannot be suppressed for long. Sadly, we are living in a post-truth age… yet still, the truth finds its way...
I just hope people realize it before it’s too late, before they’ve exhausted every single morsel. But it's not that simple, is it???
0.00 SBD,
0.16 STEEM,
0.16 SP
Ah, it's never that simple. Just as there is never just one truth. It can vary greatly depending on perspective and context. I would consider it progress if interpretations, opinions, and assessments were identified as such and not presented as facts...
0.00 SBD,
0.16 STEEM,
0.16 SP