You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: HEADLINES: Friday, September 14th, 2018 - Hurricane Florence Strikes, New Strzok/Page Texts, Censorship and Corporate Tyranny Continues, EU Legislates Internet Death, Top Google Engineers Resign, Muslim Grooming Gangs, Manafort, Steem, and More

in #informationwar7 years ago (edited)

If it really is entrapment, a judge can toss out the testimony.

In a just world. This would indeed be the case. As I stated elsewhere it is not just. People clearly guilty walk free often these days, and others face harsh sentences when they shouldn't. There is not an equal application of the law.

If they get a judge who actually honors their oaths and respects the law then you are correct. Yet there are plenty that do not.

All we need do is look at all the judges making rulings about DACA when DACA is not a law, a bill, or anything that those judges actually have the authority to rule upon since it was just the MEMO from the head of Homeland Security stating they were not going to enforce the immigration laws, along with some Obama actions(not even a signed executive action). Yet it is not a law, and it is not a bill. We still have judges who seem to think they have the authority to rule upon those things.

Sort:  

I guess I should have said SCOTUS rather than a judge because that’s where it would end up on appeal.

Still, no one is above the law, something that Mueller at least understands. Rudy, not so much.

I don't think Mueller understands that at all. Though I do agree that the SCOTUS could decide this.