You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: From the Monday Steem Desk, June 19th, 2017: Steem always rises/ The Chase Rachels/Larken Rose debate/ A brilliant quote from Will Grigg
As far as the Rachels/Rose debate, the resolved was regarding whether or not force could be used to restrict access with regards to so-called public property. I wouldn't classify Rachel's refusal to elaborate on how it could happen as a negative; that was outside the scope of the argument. At least, I thought so. The question was if, not how.
I would love to come up with a poll of some kind to see who among those watching thought won the debate, though. Curious to see what the audience as a whole thought.
That's a fair point. Where I take issue, however, is that he claimed his prescribed plan was a libertarian one. It provably is not, as it requires violence against individuals and property. I demonstrated this in my debate review post.
Duplicate reply?
Yep. Deleted.