Fully agree, again the consumers who want it all, for next to nothing would dictate what the producers do and yes, we humans would probably destroy what little of the land can be destroyed if stuffing cattle with who know what all not instead of letting them live of natures intended source of food (= grass) was to be banned!

Demand is what drives it!

Delete the demand, by introducing eco-friendly means of supplying food, by ensuring that the lands and rivers destroyed by this "totally idiotic demand driven industrial food supply" (quote me on that when eve you like).

It all comes down to responsibility, at all levels. Really, that is all it boils down to.

People want "rights", sure, then there are responsibilities to those "rights"!

Yet what they fail to realize is that what they call "rights" are in fact = choices and not in any way "rights".
Very personal choices and in no way "rights".

Rights to a choice? YES.

With all the responsibilities that come with those choices.

But then again, what do I know. I'm just rambling here and definitely falling on the popularity scales as insisting upon responsibility and telling it as it is about the fact that anything we want isn't necessarily a right in itself just because we "want" it to be, you know.

So I better quit whilst I'm way behind.

Cheers and as long as us Heinz munching creatures are not blaming ourselves, feel free to let one rip whenever and whereever possible. Especially when in an elevator!