You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why space and time are just an illusion. Biocentric universe theory
Very interesting. I am glad that this type of content has found its place on Steemit. The Universe, everything and stuff :)
For starters just a quick question:
- if time is just an interpretation of an observer - how come that we ALL interpret it the same way / direction?
And yes, i agree that the universe is a wavelength function where all points are interconnected through space, time and any other dimension we are not aware of, that we are unable to observe :)
Another question about singular universe.
- if the universe is singular and single then the probability of it existing is 1, isn't it?
We don't. When one subjective experiencer dies, their time ends. Correct?
Collectively, the sum of all subjective experiencers produces the arrow of time. If no one was born or died, what would time be? It would be change? But there would be no arrow, correct? You wouldn't know a word for beginning or for end.
Look at a fractal. It always produces something new, changing and permuting infinitely, with infinite detail, but it's really just a formula, a constant, which doesn't change. The only thing changing is the perspective and perspective exists because of the observer.
At least that is one way of looking at it. As far as a singular universe, statistically it's senseless to think this universe could happen on the first try when there are so many possible failed universes or dead universes which could have unrolled instead.
:) I'll go backwards.
If singular universe happens then it is the fact that it has happened. Hence the probability is 1.
But .. if you are saying that our universe (the reality as we perceive / imagine / collectively observe it) is the only one then ... yes, the odds are somewhat small.
What was the theory which stated that the state of a particular universe depends on its initial speed at birth? That all the constants are determined at the point of the creation and if the speed is slightly different then these constants are different and we get a different universe.
Which brings me to a question - did the universe (any universe) really happen if there was nobody to observe it at birth? Or is this yet another aspect of our skewed perception of time? Or there really was an entity outside of the universe observing and thus creating it?
You might be referring to the cosmological constant? There can be no entity outside of the universe according to current understanding, but then if all the perception or perceptronium in the universe were to be gone then the arrow of time would be gone too.