As in Taylor, BHE, as claimant, failed to prove conduct on the part of Moffett or the Estate that would entitle BHE to equitable relief from application of the statute of limitations found in § 2–7–718. The “peculiar circumstances” provision does not apply in this instance. On a final note, because BHE limited the issues on appeal to reliance on § 2–7–703(c), we have tailored our discussion accordingly.
CONCLUSION
[¶ 17] The district court did not commit error when it declined to provide BHE relief due to any peculiar circumstances under § 2–7–703(c). This Court agrees that no such peculiar circumstances exist here. Affirmed.
As in Taylor, BHE, as claimant, failed to prove conduct on the part of Moffett or the Estate that would entitle BHE to equitable relief from application of the statute of limitations found in § 2–7–718. The “peculiar circumstances” provision does not apply in this instance. On a final note, because BHE limited the issues on appeal to reliance on § 2–7–703(c), we have tailored our discussion accordingly.
CONCLUSION
[¶ 17] The district court did not commit error when it declined to provide BHE relief due to any peculiar circumstances under § 2–7–703(c). This Court agrees that no such peculiar circumstances exist here. Affirmed.