You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: I Voted

in #politics7 years ago

Couldn't click the link, don't trust it. I had to agree to something about personal information. And no, I didn't try to research it or anything, that is why I say it is illogical and go from there. If this type of action is racist for these people, so the reasons they , by they I mean the people who call Trump racist, the reasons they call Trump racist must apply to other people, but they don't say someone is racist or not by his or her actions, but by who that person is. So for me, not calling balck or latino Trump supporters not racist for thinking exacly the same as Trump, but Trump is racist, I see an inconsistency. He might be racist, he might be not. But I can't not accept an inconsistent statement.

And I really don't trust sites who use my personal data and stuff, that is why I'm on Steemit.

But either way, I prefer an explanation why two people can have the same thought or the same goal, but one is racist and the other one isn't. Not why Trump is racist or not for doing something even Tariq Nasheed, black supremacist agrees upon.

Sort:  

So for me, not calling balck or latino Trump supporters not racist for thinking exacly the same as Trump, but Trump is racist, I see an inconsistency

These black/latino supporters are stupid. This should be obvious, as black/latinos supporting a racist is a stupid thing to do. Isn't it obvious? Sounds obvious to me.


But either way, I prefer an explanation why two people can have the same thought or the same goal

I already gave you one. Hello? Are we really in the same conversation? I'm starting to think one of us is hallucinating or not paying attention.

This is one of my previous comments, explaining when an active supporter is a racist and when an active supporter is not a racist.

It doesn't matter if it's Trump, Hillary or whoever. That's exactly what I said. Active supporters of racists are racist by extension, unless they also actively voice their concern against such practices.

There, do you see the logical difference between them? Dunno if I should rely on logic anymore if you simply entirely forget or ignore a previous comment.

For saying that certain people don't think as you do are stupid is quite harsh. I don't really like calling people stupid unless they are obviously trying to hurt someone.

But anyway, so I assume that you think every American president is racist, that means you're consistent, that is good. Because they all said the same thing that Trump said, and also Latinos are racist because they also say the same things Trump said. Good, presidents and Latinos are racist, I do not agree, but hey, you think what you think.

I don't really like calling people stupid unless they are obviously trying to hurt someone.

That would be a stupid reason to call them stupid. If that's the only reason you'd call someone stupid, that's stupid too. You might disagree - but your lack of logic says you're not the brightest cookie, so I'll just ignore it.

No, I don't like calling people stupid because it is disrespectful and diminishing a persons worth. Specially when you are calling someone stupid or, how you wrote it, not the brightest cookie, in which you show that everyone who doesn't think like you do is less worth than you. So calling me stupid for not thinking how you think is illogical, and I generally don't like using adhominems for the same reason I don't call people stupid. I don't get mad or think that people are wrong because they don't think as I do, I might be the one who is wrong, who knows. But I see you're that type of person who thinks that someone who doesn't think the way they think is less worth.

And btw, being logical is my best quality. If you find some inconsistency in my reasoning, I will give you all my Steem currencies, whatever I have.

If you find some inconsistency in my reasoning

I did that throughout the whole conversation, but you'll tell me I didn't because, well, your "best quality" isn't of high quality in itself.

"Trump is not a racist" -> proof that trump was racist -> topic changes into "other presidents"

hooray

Trump is not racist by his actions because, other presidents are not racist by their actions. I don't see what's wrong with that reasoning. If 10 people did an action, and it was okay, for the 11th person it also should be okay to do that action, if it isn't, then you are not judging by the action of the 11th person, but you are judging the person itself. I don't see something wrong with this type of reasoning.

You're retarded. Retarded

If he is the 11th person to do it, he was the 11th racist person to do it. If all 10 people did it too, then they were all racists.

I said this three times in this conversation.

Okay, that is right, you said it. We all got it now.