RE: The most significant scientific breakthroughs of 2016
yeah...my point is that I think 2016 was pretty awesome, in most ways for most people it sure beat the hell out of 'normal' life two hundred years ago. If it bleeds, it leads is the operational principle of the news media...so they only talk about blood. Ten million good things could happen and one Bad thing...guess what they're going to put on the news?
I have no doubt that if NO bad thing happened ....they'd either make something up or misrepresent something that was good.
For example...here's what they say about poverty.
Almost half the world — over three billion people — live on less than $2.50 a day. At least 80% of humanity lives on less than $10 a day. More than 80 percent of the world's population lives in countries where income differentials are widening.
here's another way of looking at it.
if it bleeds it leads...if there is no blood...misrepresent something