You're wrong on all counts. I do have some SP, users have no need to expend SP on blocking posters on their blogs, or if the act of blocking each of the bots does take RC's it's relatively little. Perhaps brand new users might be unable to muster the necessary RC's - but FTG isn't just spamming random blogs, he's attacking specific targets, and all of them have nominal RC's necessary to block each of his bots from posting on their blogs.

The idea that centralized control of whose upvotes are visible on these UI's is preferable to bloggers having the ability and responsibility to police their own blogs is retarded. You are the only one to make such a bizarre claim, and I think you may be a bit off.

Deleting posts is censorship. Just because you call it spam doesn't mean I do. In this particular case we are in agreement that this is spam. There are probably people that find thousands of pics of Bernie's poop desirable. I neither want to prevent them from having their hoard of beloved pics, nor enable you or anyone else to do so.

I reckon you, I, and the UI's should all stick to our knitting - which isn't determining what other people call spam, or what they get to see or not. You may disagree, but that only makes you disagreeable.