RE: Follow those hunches of holy visage known only to you
Were you aware that she also wrote: Dreaming : anthropological and psychological interpretations.
This theme of women v institutions (per definition run by a male force, for politics and system-analysis, et al that wields sceptres of power is masculine) has been super present all last week, with many "points of contact" signalling an urgency to see what can and must be anchored on this theme by quiet but powerful suburban/sleepy-town housewives.
Giving it away while the feminine is about receiving and conceiving. It must stop. We have to find a way to become strong enough (quiet enough?) to hold onto our power (our wisdom) and sit it out with it kept safe, to share out in safer times. It's not about men v women...yawn. That is circumstantial (albeit about 60000 years old). It is about seeing what the Eternally Feminine (which above all has touched many male artists/writers/philosophers) is able to do to make things reciprocal (give AND take, harmonious flux). Creativity is not productivity or progress in itself. It is doing what needs to be done. I.e. being what man is. Essentially feminine as recepticle, earthy amphora, vessle for the creative (God) force.
Thy will be done. That's the spell around the cauldron for now.
No, wasn't aware of her other book(s), but hadn't looked either.
Indeed, powerful, sleepy housewives!
Moved back into a book by Robert Johnson, Inner Work, that underscores much of what you've written here. Wondering about the masculine soul figure in my own psyche? Where oh where is my own identifiable animus in my nighttime dreams? I do dream and record and work with these, but have not named or identified any such character, that I know when I happen upon him, "Oh, here he is!"
How about you?
Oh, he is here alright, night and day.....But I'm a Gemini, so man at head to start with, unlike your eagle brains....