You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A curiosity about Steem Proposal System

in #steem-proposal-system • 6 years ago

If the SPS checks "can vote", creating the possibility of setting a different proxy for voting on proposals implies writing new code, thus introducing risks. Iterative development, piggybacking on the "can vote" check is much safer I think. It can be improved later

6 years ago in #steem-proposal-system by
$0.04
  • Past Payouts $0.04
  • - Author $0.03
  • - Curators $0.01
2 votes
Reply 3
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    I agree that writing new code this close to the hardfork implies risks. And leaving it to the next iteration is probably the safest way to go considering the moment in time we are in. But it should probably be addressed in the next iteration, it makes little sense to mix witness voting with SPS voting.

    $0.00
      Reply