You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem Alliance proposals... time to vote!
Very good analysis. It actually put some of my thoughts into words. Your conclusions are even similar to mine.
You also found one more issue with merger I didn't think about (i goted for ut too because I like their collaborative spirit).
I differ on decentraland by impactin. It is definitely a wild card idea and problematic with the ability to ruin it built in. But there is a rule 9 which allows a two thirds majority to change rules. The issue of it not really having a structure remains. I don't see it as unfeasible i see it as needs improvement and a little more centralization. Different kinds of voting rights would solve it. Maybe 2 or 3 levels.
Posted using Partiko Android
Interesting thought. What exactly do you mean by 2 or 3 voting levels?
I think not all circles should have all voting permissions. Kinda like Steem and their keys divide it up. For example, a circle based on say Japanese curation should probably not be voting on economic decisions.