RE: Auditing My Witness: Let's do our duty [v9] , checking statements against damaging HF
Thanks @toofasteddie YOU ARE MY PROXY
i still have no idea if i'd like a fork or not.. i should study it deeply, however... Fork's are part of the cryptogame, actually is the way to break when you want to follow another way.. so we all should consider it specially if what @jesta says it's close to the truth
i liked the @jesta point in his post
he said:
My perspective today: Steem at this point is corrupted by the "unaccountable actor" and the premine it performed years ago. Those who still believe in Steemit Inc won't believe this - at least not yet, but that doesn't mean it's not true. A centralized actor is in control of this blockchain. Not only a centralized actor, but arguably a malicious one who does not listen to reason, ever admit fault, persists down unproductive paths, makes rash decisions without thinking them through, acts superior despite consistent failures, and also attacks the decentralized community that makes it all possible. All while there's nothing you or I can do to hold them accountable for this behavior.
I have read it also, and, despite I agree I’m keeping my position about not supporting any witness willing to implement a fork that put on risk not only @steemit account but also ours...
This remedy is worst than the sickness itself and it would originate the end of steem as a blockchain...for sure, instead of 1 “unaccountable” actor we may have 20 which, to tell you the truth it is not convenient at all as well.
If you follow the news now, seems @ned is willing to negotiate with the community which is a good advancement.
Posted using Partiko iOS
when you have a wall infront you need "creative" ideas to move positions, and that's what i like from @jesta manifest... look now.. seems @ned is willing to negotiate .. is the consequence of seing a wolf ;)