You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Auditing My Witness: Let's do our duty [v9] , checking statements against damaging HF

in #steem7 years ago

It would not represent any change of policy for me. It should be obvious that nullifying stake is a complete no-go area; and I have been open that I've absolutely no problem with Steemit having a founder's stake which came in the form of the ninja mine. In fact I think that's a major part of why Steem has any value at all, and that it grew up in users at a time when no crypto projects had real users.

Sort:  

It should be obvious that nullifying stake is a complete no-go area;

Agree. For me it should be obvious also but we must to be sure that other big witnesses think the same that’s why, sometimes a clear statement is much better than nothing...
Thanks for your clarification.

Posted using Partiko iOS