RE: New Witness voting rules we may need to do

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: New Witness voting rules we may need to do

View the full context

fernandosoder (55)in #steem • 5 years ago

Thank you for referencing my post. Although I disagree with your Idea of giving more value to votes from older accounts, it gave me a better idea based on this concept.

5 years ago in #steem by fernandosoder (55)

Sort:

onealfa (74) 5 years ago (edited)

What brought me to this scheme is my believe, that the longer someone has been in this community, and the longer has kept a substantial amount of funds in it - the more he is dedicated, and better understands all the things here (which are sometimes hard to fully grasp by newcomers).
Anyone who jumps in just for a "quick profit" should not have a huge influence into communities future, especially right from his first days.
It all was just my quick reaction after reading your post . Everyone is free to disagree, and/or bring a better alternatives.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

fernandosoder (55) 5 years ago (edited)

What brought me to this scheme is my believe, that the longer someone has been in this community, and the longer has kept a substantial amount of funds in it - the more he is dedicated, and better understands all the things here (which are sometimes hard to fully grasp by newcomers).

Indeed.

Anyone who jumps in just for a "quick profit" should not have a huge influence into communities future, especially right from his first days.

Can't disagree with that.

It all was just my quick reaction after reading your post . Everyone is free to disagree, and/or bring a better alternatives.

I am sorry if I sounded rude or arrogant. I was just considering the possibility of a takeover coming from an old account_{(like @steem or @steemit)} but your concerns brought up the idea of chronological security to influence witness votes.

Already published another post about it.

$0.00

2 votes