You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: New Witness voting rules we may need to do

in #steem • 5 years ago (edited)

What brought me to this scheme is my believe, that the longer someone has been in this community, and the longer has kept a substantial amount of funds in it - the more he is dedicated, and better understands all the things here (which are sometimes hard to fully grasp by newcomers).
Anyone who jumps in just for a "quick profit" should not have a huge influence into communities future, especially right from his first days.
It all was just my quick reaction after reading your post . Everyone is free to disagree, and/or bring a better alternatives.

5 years ago in #steem by
$0.00
    1 vote
    Reply 1
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     5 years ago (edited)

    What brought me to this scheme is my believe, that the longer someone has been in this community, and the longer has kept a substantial amount of funds in it - the more he is dedicated, and better understands all the things here (which are sometimes hard to fully grasp by newcomers).

    Indeed.

    Anyone who jumps in just for a "quick profit" should not have a huge influence into communities future, especially right from his first days.

    Can't disagree with that.

    It all was just my quick reaction after reading your post . Everyone is free to disagree, and/or bring a better alternatives.

    I am sorry if I sounded rude or arrogant. I was just considering the possibility of a takeover coming from an old account(like @steem or @steemit) but your concerns brought up the idea of chronological security to influence witness votes.

    Already published another post about it.