Hidemyacc vs Gologin
Hidemyacc vs GoLogin: Which antidetect browser fits you better?
When it comes to managing multiple online accounts safely, both Hidemyacc and GoLogin are well-known antidetect browsers. I’ve used GoLogin for years and have recently spent months testing Hidemyacc. They share the same goal - help you create separate browser profiles with unique fingerprints—but they approach it differently. Here’s how they stack up from a long-time user’s perspective.
Pricing and Accessibility
One of the biggest contrasts is the price. Hidemyacc starts at around $10/month, making it far more accessible for beginners or solo users. Meanwhile, GoLogin’s entry plan is around $49/month, which can feel steep if you’re just starting out. Both platforms offer free trials, but Hidemyacc clearly lowers the barrier to entry, especially if you want to test things before committing.
Supported Platforms and Browser Customization
Hidemyacc is more versatile across platforms, supporting Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS. GoLogin also supports major desktop systems and Android, but lacks iOS support.
Another edge for Hidemyacc is its wide browser engine support - you can base your profiles on Chrome, Brave, Opera, Edge, Yandex, and Safari. GoLogin mainly sticks to Chrome-based profiles, which limits how diverse your fingerprints can appear.
Fingerprint Control
Both tools allow you to generate unique browser fingerprints for each profile, including user agents, screen sizes, languages, and so on. However, Hidemyacc goes further by supporting mobile fingerprints for both Android and iOS, while GoLogin only offers Android mobile fingerprints. This makes Hidemyacc more suitable for people managing cross-device campaigns.
Profile Management Experience
Hidemyacc offers a richer set of profile management tools. You can create quick profiles in one click, manage large batches of profiles, use a recycle bin for deleted ones, view profile activity history, and even transfer or share profiles between team members.
GoLogin also handles multiple profiles well, but it lacks some of these convenience features, which means managing large numbers of profiles can be slightly more manual and time-consuming.
Proxy Integration
Both platforms support using proxies with your profiles, but Hidemyacc goes a step further by including a built-in proxy manager and even a proxy store with some free options available. GoLogin supports proxies but doesn’t integrate them as tightly - you’ll have to set up and manage your proxy sources separately.
Automation and Workflow
This is an area where Hidemyacc shines. It includes no-code automation tools, the ability to record user actions, and an API for advanced users. This lets you build repeatable tasks directly inside the app, without coding.
GoLogin also has an API and supports Puppeteer/Playwright, but it’s more technical and requires developer skills. For non-coders, Hidemyacc is much easier to automate.
User Experience and Interface
Both have clean interfaces, but Hidemyacc’s UI is generally more modern and beginner-friendly, with clearer layouts and faster onboarding. GoLogin feels slightly heavier and has a steeper learning curve, especially when you’re managing many profiles for the first time.
Reliability and Community Trust
According to the comparison data, Hidemyacc scores around 4.9/5 on Trustpilot, while GoLogin sits around 4.5/5. In my experience, GoLogin has had occasional stability issues (crashes when running many profiles), while Hidemyacc has been lighter on system resources and more stable in daily work.
Final Verdict
If you’re looking for a cost-effective, beginner-friendly, and feature-rich antidetect browser, Hidemyacc is the stronger choice. It offers more platforms, more browser options, better automation tools, and smoother profile management at a fraction of the cost.
GoLogin is still a solid tool, especially if you’re already invested in it or run heavy workloads where long-term stability matters. But for most new users and small-to-mid scale operations, Hidemyacc gives you more value and flexibility.