We probably have differences in what we see as capitalism, but I think I can span much of that by saying that if capitalism or communism is built as/of a social construct they will not have full respect for free will within them.

I agree that all the points are not 'bad' or 'morally' problematic. The few that are, contain considerable aggression against what would be free will/liberty. There are some contradictions, but the bigger contradiction in the frame of reference is how could a anarchist abide by these points and still claim to be anarchist?

What happens historically in 'for the betterment of the people' there has been a group called vanguards who will 'lead' the revolution movement, but will then supposedly step down after the communist ideal has transformed society. For some reason the society is never transformed to the point the vanguards will step down.

"only true anarchy allows for true individual empowerment without overpowering of anyone."
Here we are in complete agreement.

The Ubuntu definition appears to bend a lot to who is using it, that leaves me a little skeptical of what it means. I have found 'live and let live' has a lot of echo to ancestry, and the natural state. I don't see balance and harmony occurring in nature all the time, but in brief stretches there is a 'live and let live' that appears to produce the most peace per unit of time. I suppose this is why I see the 'don't aggress against people or their property' in fairly close context to 'live and let live'.

In nature there is also varying response to aggression. Some severe and some mild. This may contribute some uncertainty that reinforces conflict avoidance. I'm not sure how to approach nature as a balanced or imbalanced measure. I have a pretty strong streak of realism in my philosophical thinking that attempts to look at the 'thing' as it is with the best tools of epistemology within reach.

That last paragraph is excellent. No disagreement there. There is just one thing that continues to arise. Even if you liberate yourself, the reality exists that you could live your life peacefully, and productively, and have a external social construct aggress against your peace and life on a regular basis. This does manifest a type of anger that I find hard to deny should exist.