You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Wolf-Rayet Stars
Well that's actually quite interesting. But how did they determine it was solar winds and not "Chemical cauldrons" like nonation said? (Like classification wise.)
Well that's actually quite interesting. But how did they determine it was solar winds and not "Chemical cauldrons" like nonation said? (Like classification wise.)
all extremely massive stars lose large amounts of mass to solar wind. I think what they figured out first was the stars with that emission spectrum were still very large and not dwarfs (which is what they would be after creating a nebula)
The mass lost due to solar wind seems extremely large atleast in pictures to the point where it's forming their own nebulae.
I must have misread your first one, it isn't a planetary nebula but it is a form of nebula
Ah, ok thank you.