You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Some thoughts about the obvious.
But, do you think they define themselves as the bad guys? I believe that they define themselves as "more intelligent", a lie that they like to believe, and as they define themselves in that way they think they know what is best for everyone.
They certainly don't know what the concept of "hell" means, and it is because they have always lived in it. It is precisely the fact that they "don't" have a moral compass that makes them be in hell.
no...
Not from their perspective it doesn't...(to be 'in hell', one must be suffering. External judgments on them are irrelevant)
They are quite happy living their reality.
Well, what is happiness? Don't you think it's the state in which the human does not want to change anything? We say, for example, that someone is happy because they are in the circumstances they want to be.
These people that you speak of, seem to be looking for something all the time, to always be going somewhere, and that is a symptom of deprivation, therefore, they don't have what they want.
Maybe, just maybe, they seem happy in our eyes, but "seem" is not the same as "being".
maybe being in that state is their happiness..?
No one knows another's heart, and to project and define it by your own terms, is destined to fail..
Of course, this is a Byzantine discussion.
Not really, I've thought for many years, that someway of identifying these types of people would be great step forward for humanity..
(universal psychological monitoring up to 16 would identify 70% of these personality types, emerging into adulthood..)
Very 'big brother' though, I admit! (worryingly so).
Surely, although that cure is potentially more dangerous than beneficial.