RE: The truth shall set you free! Update to the corruption on Steem(it)! More details coming soon!
Something I have just realized today is that unrestricted stake weighted flagging has demonstrably driven people from the platform. The downvote pool is not a mistake, and it is not credible that the devs are unaware of what Bernie will do with that additional stake.
Bernie has committed criminal acts on this blockchain, including death threats, extortion, and sexual harassment. Unless the blockchain is destroyed that evidence will persist and be available in any litigation that follows the destruction I expect to be caused by HF21. Once the witnesses wipe their HD's that evidence will be gone, and once enough people are flagged off the platform, witnesses will have no incentive to maintain the blockchain.
Profiteers aren't creating the business model here, but follow in the footsteps of Bain Capital, and the litigation they are presently embroiled in is a sobering consideration for the whales contemplating unprofitable liabilities resulting from their actions on Steem.
Food for thought.
It has been determined that you are trash, therefore, you have received a negative vote.
PLEASE NOTE: If you engage with the trash above you also risk receiving a negative vote on your comment.
Given the time frame that has been shared on account creation dates, I think it is safe to assume that Bernie is at least an equal with Steemit inc, if not the actual owner. I imagine the account has more Steem than anyone realizes, and as such would have no need for there to be a free downvote pool to utilize.
Once we begin talking such large stakes, given the draw they have on the reward pool, downvotes by all would by default find their way into the higher stake owners payouts.
I did not save the link, as I have no need to prove to another, but someone else here (believe it was Mitrado) posted links some months back showing that edits were made to the blockchain by the person in question here that are not showing what the edits were. This would suggest that the chain is not so permanent as we are told block chains are supposed to be.
While I read these posts (not because I have a strong feeling on it, just curious) I normally stay silent. But you are my favorite "trash" on the site and wanted to give you some thoughts to think about since I don't do the Discord thing. Glad you haven't been chased off as so many I followed have. It makes my remaining 6 weeks or so here more enjoyable. I appreciate your insights (even when I don't agree).
I appreciate your informed consideration as well. Honestly, I am not always in agreement with me either =p I just speak my mind, and seek to understand the facts as I go.
I would have to change my understanding were the editing of the blockchain data to be as trivially undertaken as you have heard. My understanding is that a HF involving a supermajority of witnesses would be required to edit the blockchain. Such collusion so commonly applied as the comment indicates would change my grasp of what is going on here quite a bit.
Thanks!
It has been determined that you are trash, therefore, you have received a negative vote.
PLEASE NOTE: If you engage with the trash above you also risk receiving a negative vote on your comment.