I appreciate your informed consideration as well. Honestly, I am not always in agreement with me either =p I just speak my mind, and seek to understand the facts as I go.

I would have to change my understanding were the editing of the blockchain data to be as trivially undertaken as you have heard. My understanding is that a HF involving a supermajority of witnesses would be required to edit the blockchain. Such collusion so commonly applied as the comment indicates would change my grasp of what is going on here quite a bit.

Thanks!