RE: Churn Rates on STEEM 2018 Review
Hi @paulag, thanks for the follow-up to the Q3 report! I like the concept of additionally filtering out accounts that haven't posted or voted. I agree that this probably gives a more realistic picture on the retention for Steem's social media aspects. A couple of apps rely on Steem features other than votes or comments. You've mentioned SteemMonsters already, using mainly customJSONs and maybe a few transfers. SteemDice brings only wallet activity and seems to be pretty popular at the moment. Finding a metric for an "active" user becomes harder with those. Looking forward to the Q1/2019 report with less HF20 influence!
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
I didnt even consider Steemdice. @lextenebris mentions in a comment a new class of filterable items to account for different uses of the block and I agree with that for sure.
Thanks for the review
Thank you for your review, @crokkon! Keep up the good work!