RE: BidBots, Abuse & Curation: Addressing the Elephant in the Chain, Gazing Into The Abyss.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: BidBots, Abuse & Curation: Addressing the Elephant in the Chain, Gazing Into The Abyss.

jaguar.force (72)in #utopian-io • 6 years ago

See the comments in that post, smooth, ats-david and josephsavage appear to be interpreting it in the same way, as in: The rewards curve goes linear for posts around $6 and above.

6 years ago in #utopian-io by jaguar.force (72)

$0.00

Sort:

Trending

[-]

mathowl (64) 6 years ago (edited)

I don't see them saying that they will use the 2e12 curve:

The above chart demonstrates 3 different constants fed into the convergent linear rewards curve and their effects on comment payouts. As shown in the charts, 2e12 approaches our current linear rewards at roughly 16 STEEM, which is why we feel it will provide a meaningful and balanced change to Steem’s economic distribution.

They say they think 2e12 is good. But, it doesn't seem like a done deal. They do say that they really want this type of reward function. But the constants will determine when the new function is worse or better than the current linear function.

$0.00

[-]

jaguar.force (72) 6 years ago

Yes the information provided is as usual ambiguous, but by saying "which is why we feel it will provide a meaningful and balanced change to Steem’s economic distribution." we feel it is being implied that is the curve that is included in the proposal and even in the testnet, and although It is not a done deal as you say, it seems to be the curve to be implemented if the HF21 passes.

$0.00