Hello, @harry-heightz!

Thank you for another nice contribution to Utopian. This is an interesting project, and you did a really good job of promoting this tool with an informative blog post. Keep up the good work.

The post is also comprehensive and detailed, and the content is unique and editorial. You went into detail about all the progress made so far, and you also managed to combine all the information provided with quality visuals.

However, the post did have issues of style and proofreading. For instance:

But, in other to make this content short and concise, I'll skip those.

I think you meant to write: "But in order to make this content short and concise, I'll skip those."

That's because it's features/functions are basic for now.

This one should read: "That's because its features/functions are basic for now."

To sum up, this is a very interesting review, but I think that your post would have benefited from another round of proofreading.

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.

Need help? Chat with us on Discord.

[utopian-moderator]